HireVue pioneered AI‑powered video interviewing, but its enterprise‑grade price tag (starting around US$35,000 per year) and basic reporting have pushed many organisations to look elsewhere.
Some reviewers say that initial integration can be difficult for recruiters. Hiring teams now prioritise platforms that automate high‑volume screening, deliver deeper analytics and offer flexible workflows.
This guide compares five standout HireVue alternatives across usability, features and limitations so you can choose the best fit.
1. ZappyVue – The Leading HireVue Alternative for Enterprise Recruiters
Best for –.Businesses of all sizes looking for AI-powered interview solutions
Why switch to ZappyVue?
ZappyVue is considered as the best HireVue alternative as it’s a next-generation AI video interviewing platform built for modern, data-driven hiring teams.
A product by Zappyhire, it integrates AI-driven assessments, automated scoring, and structured video interviews within one intuitive platform.
Unlike point solutions that handle only video interviews, ZappyVue powers the interview funnel, helping recruiters make faster, fairer, and more objective decisions.
Enterprises choose ZappyVue because it blends efficiency, intelligence, and scalability, whether you’re screening 100 candidates or 10,000.
Key features
AI-powered shortlisting – Automatically ranks candidates using machine learning-based scoring models, cutting screening time by up to 80%.
Automated video interviews – Create structured, one-way interviews with consistent evaluation rubrics and customizable scoring criteria.
Predictive analytics – Surface insights on candidate fit, recruiter efficiency, and interview performance trends to optimize hiring strategies.
Evaluating language proficiency – The system evaluates candidate responses for language and communication skills with up to 98% accuracy
5 layers of advanced proctoring – Includes facial recognition, browser activity monitoring, environment sound checks, tab-switch tracking, and more, ensuring test integrity and fairness across all assessments and interviews.
Easy integrations – Works natively with major ATS tools, assessment platforms, and HR systems.
Enterprise scalability – Built to handle high-volume hiring without compromising candidate experience or recruiter productivity.
Features that ZappyVue has that Hirevue doesn’t
ZappyVue includes all of Spark Hire’s core functions (one‑way video interviews, rating and collaboration) and adds 5‑layer proctoring, automated follow‑up questions, AI‑driven candidate ranking and bulk invitations.
It also supports 50+ languages and integrates predictive analytics, making it versatile and suitable for companies of all sizes.
What are the potential cons?
No live interview – Since ZappyVue emphasises automation, it’s not fit for users looking for live video call tools like Skype, GMeet or Zoom.
2. Spark Hire – Easy‑to‑Use Video Interviewing for SMBs
Best for – Small‑ to medium‑sized businesses needing an intuitive video interviewing tool
Why switch to Spark Hire?
Spark Hire offers a streamlined user experience and affordable pricing. It’s ideal when recruiters want a simple, one‑way or live video interviewing solution.
Reviewers highlight that Spark Hire is quite easy to use, with efficient candidate management and scheduling capabilities to improve hiring speed and candidate experience.
Key features
User‑friendly interface – Recruiters and candidates can navigate the platform with little training; the system saves time and simplifies candidate evaluations.
Efficient scheduling – Built‑in scheduling tools streamline interview coordination, reducing back‑and‑forth emails.
Collaborative reviews – Hiring teams can share and comment on interview videos to make more informed decisions.
What are the potential cons?
Integration issues – Users report that Spark Hire’s integrations with ATSs such as Jobvite can be clunky or incompatible.
Limited customisation – Some teams find it challenging to adapt Spark Hire’s workflows to specific recruitment needs.
Technical glitches – Occasional audio/video issues may require rescheduling interviews.
3. VidCruiter – Feature‑Rich Video Interviewing with Customisable Workflows
Best for – Organisations wanting asynchronous and live video interviews with configurable templates.
Why switch to VidCruiter?
VidCruiter goes beyond simple video interviews by supporting asynchronous and live sessions, automated scheduling and ATS integration. Hiring teams can use customisable interview templates to reduce bias and standardise assessments.
Key features
Asynchronous and live video interviews – Candidates respond on their own schedule while recruiters can still conduct live sessions when needed.
Interview templates & scheduler – Pre‑built templates and automated calendars improve efficiency.
Deep feature set – VidCruiter offers interview scheduling, candidate self‑booking, detailed reporting, AI screening and customizable workflows.
What are the potential cons?
Steep learning curve – Reviewers note that the interface isn’t intuitive and requires training.
Workflow customisation limits – Some users find limited options for tailoring interview workflows.
Technical issues – Video sessions may freeze or lag, especially on older devices.
Mobile & integration problems – The platform has less extensive integrations and mobile compatibility issues.
4. TestGorilla – Extensive Test Library with Anti‑Cheating Tools
Best for – Organisations seeking a large library of pre‑built assessments and anti‑cheating features.
Why switch to TestGorilla?
TestGorilla simplifies candidate screening with over 150 pre‑built tests across cognitive, programming, software and personality domains.
Users appreciate its ease of use, customisable assessments and time‑saving candidate screening. Anti‑cheating mechanisms like webcam monitoring and IP flagging ensure assessment integrity.
Key features
Large test library – 150+ pre‑built tests plus a custom test builder.
Anti‑cheating measures – Webcam monitoring, full‑screen tracking and IP flagging.
What are the potential cons?
Technical issues – Users report assessment problems, including technical glitches and insufficient personality insights.
Pricing – The platform’s pricing can be steep for small companies or irregular hiring needs.
Subscription limits – Subscription tiers may restrict access to specialised assessments.
Short test durations & confusing charges – Some users feel tests are too short or have unclear billing
5. Codility – Technical Assessment Platform for Developers
Best for – technical hiring teams seeking robust coding tests and interactive coding interviews
Why switch to Codility?
Codility specialises in technical assessments with plagiarism detection, suspicious‑behaviour flags and ID verification. It provides detailed reports on correctness, performance and complexity to enable data‑driven hiring decisions.
The platform integrates with HR systems like and offers interactive coding interviews via whiteboard and pair‑programming tools.
Key features
Robust cheat‑detection – AI‑resistant task library, proctoring, plagiarism detection and test playback.
Data‑driven reports – Detailed performance reports help recruiters make evidence‑based decisions.
Integrations and customization – Connects with major HR systems and allows custom workflows to fit specific hiring needs.
Interactive interviews – Live whiteboard and pair‑programming sessions for real‑time problem solving.
What are the potential cons?
Candidate discomfort with monitoring – Extensive monitoring may make candidates feel uneasy.
Complex reports – Users say reports require time and expertise to interpret.
Learning curve for customisation – Customisation options may require a learning curve.
Missing features & unclear interface – Reviewers also note Codility lacks some candidate‑management tools and suffers from unclear navigation
FAQ
What should I consider when choosing a HireVue alternative?
Look for solutions that match your hiring volume, budget, and tech stack. Some of the most important factors include ease of setup, candidate experience, custom workflows, integration options, and automated scoring or analytics features.
If you’re still exploring your options, our roundup of the best video interview tools in the US dives deeper into the key features, pros, and pricing of top platforms.
Which HireVue alternative is best for enterprise hiring?
ZappyVue stands out for large enterprises seeking scalable, AI-driven video interviewing with advanced automation, analytics, and customization options. It’s built for teams managing high-volume, multi-role hiring pipelines.
Are these HireVue alternatives suitable for SMBs too?
Yes. Tools like the versatile ZappyVue and Spark Hire(which is specifically designed for SMBs) will be good for companies that need simple, affordable video interviewing without the complexity of enterprise-only systems.
Can I integrate these video interview tools with my existing ATS?
Most modern video interviewing platforms offer integrations with popular Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). ZappyVue, VidCruiter, and TestGorilla, for example, provide flexible API or native integrations.
What’s the most affordable HireVue alternative?
For smaller teams, Spark Hire and TestGorilla offer budget-friendly plans. But for companies of any size looking to balance affordability with automation and long-term ROI, ZappyVue delivers the best value.
